Self-Monitoring and Self-Efficacy in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease During Low-Sodium Diet Self-Management Interventions: Secondary Analysis of the ESMO and SUBLIME Trials.

BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic kidney disease are often requested to engage in self-monitoring sodium (i.e. salt) intake, but it is currently unknown how self-monitoring would empower them. This study aims to assess: (1) how frequent self-monitoring tools are being used during low-sodium diet self-management interventions; (2) whether self-efficacy (i.e. trust in own capability to manage the chronic disease) is associated with self-monitoring frequency; and (3) whether higher self-monitoring frequency is associated with an improvement in self-efficacy over time. METHOD: Data from two multicenter randomized controlled trials (ESMO [n = 151] and SUBLIME [n = 99]) among adult Dutch patients with chronic kidney disease (eGFR ≥ 20-25 mL/min/1.73 m2) were used. In both studies, routine care was compared to a 3-month low-sodium diet self-management intervention with several self-monitoring tools (online food diary, home blood pressure monitor, and urinary sodium measurement device [only ESMO]). Data was collected on usage frequency of self-monitoring tools. Frequencies during the interventions were compared between low and high baseline self-efficacy groups using the Mann-Whitney U test and T-test and associated with changes in self-efficacy during the interventions using Spearman correlation coefficients. RESULTS: Large variations in self-monitoring frequency were observed. In both interventions, usage of self-monitoring tools was highest during the first month with sharp drops thereafter. The online food diary was the most frequently used tool. In the ESMO intervention, low baseline self-efficacy was associated with a higher usage frequency of self-monitoring tools. This finding was not confirmed in the SUBLIME intervention. No significant associations were found between usage frequency of self-monitoring tools and changes in self-efficacy over time. CONCLUSION: Patients with low self-efficacy might benefit most from frequent usage of self-monitoring tools when sufficient guidance and support is provided.

A Self-management Approach for Dietary Sodium Restriction in Patients With CKD: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are particularly sensitive to dietary sodium. We evaluated a self-management approach for dietary sodium restriction in patients with CKD. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Nephrology outpatient clinics in 4 Dutch hospitals. 99 adults with CKD stages 1 to 4 or a functioning (estimated glomerular filtration rate≥25mL/min/1.73m2) kidney transplant, hypertension, and sodium intake>130mmol/d. INTERVENTION: Routine care was compared with routine care plus a web-based self-management intervention including individual e-coaching and group meetings implemented over a 3-month intervention period, followed by e-coaching over a 6-month maintenance period. OUTCOMES: Primary outcomes were sodium excretion after the 3-month intervention and after the 6-month maintenance period. Secondary outcomes were blood pressure, proteinuria, costs, quality of life, self-management skills, and barriers and facilitators for implementation. RESULTS: Baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate was 55.0±22.0mL/min/1.73m2. During the intervention period, sodium excretion decreased in the intervention group from 188±8 (SE) to 148±8mmol/d (P<0.001), but did not change significantly in the control group. At 3 months, mean sodium excretion was 24.8 (95% CI, 0.1-49.6) mmol/d lower in the intervention group (P=0.049). At 3 months, systolic blood pressure (SBP) decreased in the intervention group from 140±3 to 132±3mm Hg (P<0.001), but was unchanged in the control group. Mean difference in SBP across groups was-4.7 (95% CI, -10.7 to 1.3) mm Hg (P=0.1). During the maintenance phase, sodium excretion increased in the intervention group, but remained lower than at baseline at 160±8mmol/d (P=0.01), while it decreased in the control group from 174±9 at the end of the intervention period to 154±9mmol/d (P=0.001). Consequently, no difference in sodium excretion between groups was observed after the maintenance phase. There was no difference in SBP between groups after the maintenance phase. LIMITATIONS: Limited power, postrandomization loss to follow-up, Hawthorne effect, lack of dietary data, short-term follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: A coaching intervention reduced sodium intake at 3 months. Efficacy during the maintenance phase was diminished, possibly due to inadvertent adoption of the intervention by the control group. FUNDING: Grant funding from the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development and the Dutch Kidney Foundation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with study number NCT02132013.

Lifestyle intervention to improve quality of life and prevent weight gain after renal transplantation: Design of the Active Care after Transplantation (ACT) randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Low physical activity and reduced physical functioning are common after renal transplantation, resulting in a reduced quality of life. Another common post-transplantation complication is poor cardio-metabolic health, which plays a main role in long-term outcomes in renal transplant recipients (RTR). It is increasingly recognized that weight gain in the first year after transplantation, especially an increase in fat mass, is a highly common contributor to cardio-metabolic risk. The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of usual care to the effects of exercise alone, and exercise combined with dietary counseling, on physical functioning, quality of life and post-transplantation weight gain in RTR. METHODS: The Active Care after Transplantation study is a multicenter randomized controlled trial with three arms in which RTR from 3 Dutch hospitals are randomized within the first year after transplantation to usual care, to exercise intervention (3 months supervised exercise 2 times per week followed by 12 months active follow-up), or to an exercise + diet intervention, consisting of the exercise training with additional dietary counseling (12 sessions over 15 months by a renal dietician). In total, 219 participants (73 per group) will be recruited. The primary outcome is the subdomain physical functioning of quality of life, (SF-36 PF). Secondary outcomes include other evaluations of quality of life (SF-36, KDQOL-SF, EQ-5D), objective measures of physical functioning (aerobic capacity and muscle strength), level of physical activity, gain in adiposity (body fat percentage by bio-electrical impedance assessment, BMI, waist circumference), and cardiometabolic risk factors (blood pressure, lipids, glucose metabolism). Furthermore, data on renal function, medical history, medication, psychological factors (motivation, kinesiophobia, coping style), nutrition knowledge, nutrition intake, nutrition status, fatigue, work participation, process evaluation and cost-effectiveness are collected. DISCUSSION: Evidence on the effectiveness of an exercise intervention, or an exercise + diet intervention on physical functioning, weight gain and cardiometabolic health in RTR is currently lacking. The outcomes of the present study may help to guide future evidence-based lifestyle care after renal transplantation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Number: NCT01047410 .

Liver Enzymes and the Development of Posttransplantation Diabetes Mellitus in Renal Transplant Recipients.

BACKGROUND: Posttransplantation diabetes mellitus (PTDM) is common in renal transplant recipients (RTR), increasing the risk of graft failure, cardiovascular disease, and mortality. Early detection of a high risk for PTDM is warranted. Because liver function and liver fat are involved, we investigated whether serum liver markers are associated with future PTDM in RTR. METHODS: Between 2001 and 2003, 606 RTR with a functioning allograft beyond the first year after transplantation were included of which 500 participants (56% men; age, 50 ± 12 years) were free of diabetes at baseline and had liver enzyme values (1 missing) available. Serum concentrations of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), alkaline phosphatase were measured at baseline at 6.0 (6.2-11.5) years posttransplantation. PTDM cases were recorded until April 2012. RESULTS: During median follow-up for 9.6 years (interquartile range [IQR], 6.2-10.2) beyond baseline, 76 (15.2%) patients developed PTDM. Comparing the highest to the lower tertiles, higher liver enzyme activities were significantly related to incident PTDM for ALT (hazard ratio [HR], 2.22; IQR, 1.42-3.48), for GGT (HR, 2.93; IQR, 1.87-4.61), and for alkaline phosphatase (HR, 1.78; IQR, 1.13-2.80). The associations of ALT and GGT with development of PTDM were independent of potential confounders and risk factors, including age, sex, renal function, medication use, lifestyle factors, adiposity, presence of the metabolic syndrome, fasting glucose, HbA1c, proinsulin, and cytomegalovirus status. CONCLUSIONS: Markers for liver function and liver fat in the subclinical range are potential markers for future PTDM, independent of other known risk factors. This may allow for early detection and management of PTDM development.

Physical inactivity: a risk factor and target for intervention in renal care.

Regular physical activity is associated with an increased quality of life and reduced morbidity and mortality in the general population and in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Physical activity, cardiorespiratory fitness, and muscle mass decrease even in the early stages of CKD, and continue to decrease with disease progression; notably, full recovery is generally not achieved with transplantation. The combined effects of uraemia and physical inactivity drive the loss of muscle mass. Regular physical activity benefits cardiometabolic, neuromuscular and cognitive function across all stages of CKD, and therefore provides an approach to address the multimorbidity of the CKD population. Interestingly, maintenance of muscle health is associated with renoprotective effects. Despite evidence of its benefits, physical activity and exercise management are not routinely addressed in the care of these patients. Although studies defining the optimum frequency, duration and intensity of physical activity are lacking, evidence from related fields can guide practical approaches to the care of patients with renal disease. Optimization of metabolic and nutritional status alongside promotion of physical activity is recommended. Behavioural approaches are now recognized as crucial in helping patients to adopt lifestyle changes and might prove valuable in integrating physical activity into renal care.

Fear of Movement and Low Self-Efficacy Are Important Barriers in Physical Activity after Renal Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Physical activity (PA) and exercise are commonly used as preventive measures for cardiovascular disease in the general population, and could be effective in the management of post-transplantation cardiovascular risk. PA levels are low after renal transplantation and very few renal transplant recipients (RTR) meet the PA guidelines. Identification of barriers to regular PA is important to identify targets for intervention to improve PA levels after renal transplantation. We investigated fear of movement and physical self-efficacy as barriers to PA in RTR. METHODS: RTR were investigated between 2001-2003. The Tampa Score of Kinesiophobia-Dutch Version (TSK-11) was used to assess fear of movement. Physical self-efficacy was measured with the LIVAS-scale. PA was assessed using validated questionnaires (Tecumseh Occupational Activity Questionnaire and the Minnesota Leisure Time Physical Activity Questionnaire). RESULTS: A total of 487 RTR (age 51±12 years, 55% men) were studied. Median score [interquartile range] on TSK-11 was 22 [17-26]. Low physical self-efficacy (Exp B:0.41[0.31-0.54], p<0.001) and history of myocardial infarction, transient ischemic attack and cerebrovascular accident (Exp B:1.30[1.03-1.63],p = 0.03) were independent determinants for fear of movement. Fear of movement was associated with lower daily PA, occupational, sports and leisure time PA. Mediation-analysis showed that a large part (73%) of the effect of fear of movement on PA was explained by low physical self-efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: This study was the first to examine fear of movement and self-efficacy in relation to PA in RTR. Fear of movement was associated with a low PA level, and the larger part of this relation was mediated by low physical self-efficacy. Both fear of movement and physical self-efficacy level are important targets for intervention during rehabilitation after renal transplantation.